When you buy through link on our site , we may clear an affiliate commission . Here ’s how it ferment .
Bear attacks on humans are rare , but they top out in summertime , when both species are out and about . So far this time of year , study of serious or fatal human - bear difference of opinion have emerged in British Columbia , Arizona , Yellowstone National Park , Alaska , New Jersey , Colorado , and even Norway , where a polar bear killed one and mangle five .
As with human criminal offence , DNA grounds has found a place in investigation into bear attacks . functionary use transmitted analysis to check that they have find the guilty bear . This ratification not only re - insure the human being in the area , it protects other , unacquainted bears from being pour down . [ Read the main story : Forensic Science Heads into the Woods ]
The techniqueused by forensic labsto confirm the identity of an aggressor , bear or human , is essentially the same — investigator look at specific , short sections of DNA .
desoxyribonucleic acid is made up of a four - letter computer code , and these sections , called microsatellite markers , have a repetitive chronological sequence . The number of times this sequence repeat itself within the section varies between individuals , both humans and bear . As a upshot , scientists can utilize a handful of these markers to create a profile of an individual , or show relatedness between individuals .
An individual has two versions , called alleles , of computer code at each marker , one inherit from the mother , the other from the father .
" You do n’t actually look at the DNA that come from the grounds particular , " said Mary Burnham Curtis , a older forensic scientist and head of the genetics squad at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Fish and Wildlife Forensic Laboratory . " What a forensic scientist would do is amplify or simulate DNA from the evidence item . There is so little DNA and you involve to look at a lot of it . "
In gild to copy the marker in head , investigators take a leader bit called a primer that matches up with the region of DNA on either side of the mark . These flat coat need to be specific to the target specie . For example , samples from the setting of a bear approach are potential to contain both human and bear marker , so results could be confusing without the use of mintage - specific primers , concord to Curtis .
In the national lab , forensic scientist practice 10 marker that are specific for bears , allot to Curtis .
Unlike in human forensics , the pick of genetic markers for wildlife is n’t standardized . Labs looking at bears , for model , have independently determined which marker they use . So , while there is overlap , the whole suite of marking varies among labs . And , unlike for humans , there are no commercially made kit to assist in the analytic thinking , according to Curtis .
Attacks by large predators , such as bear and catamount , make up only a petite piece of wildlife forensic work , which largely focuses on enforcing law intend to protect wildlife , bycatching poachers or those illegally transporting animate being part .
" A muckle of commonwealth now are concerned in build wildlife offence labs , part of it is being driven by endangered metal money problems and conservation , " she say .
